When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Heres how it works.
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg recently compared the headsets in a video.
Unsurprisingly, Zuckerberg prefers the headset made by Meta, which he runs, over Apple Vision Pro.
Microsoft’s Office apps are available on both Apple Vision Pro (shown above) and Meta Quest.
The sentiments shared by Zuckerberg are hardly shocking.
Sheel Mohnot shared Zuckerberg’s video on X (formerly Twitter).
Microsoft’s plans for augmented and virtual reality
Windows Mixed Reality (WMR) has been deprecated.
Microsoft’s Office apps are available on both Apple Vision Pro (shown above) and Meta Quest.
A recent Insider build of Windows 11 was the first to not support WMR.
Meta Quest has a growing library of Microsoft apps as well, includingOffice appsandXbox Cloud Gaming.
Microsoft doesn’t seem to care where you use its services.
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg claims that Meta Quest is a better product than Apple Vision Pro.
The company’s leadership just wants you to use Microsoft apps and services.
With apps on both Meta Quest and Apple Vision Pro, it doesn’t matter if Zuckerberg is right.
Is Zuckerberg right about Apple Vision Pro?
He is the CEO of Meta, which makes Meta Quest.
So, are Zuckerberg’s points valid?
Despite his inherent bias, the CEO raises some good points.
I don’t think anyone can reasonably dispute that Meta Quest is a better value than Apple Vision Pro.
Meta Quest costs just under $500 while Apple Vision Pro costs just under $3,500.
It has a larger library of titles, better latency for hand tracking, and supports dedicated VR controllers.
So, is Zuckerberg right?
I would say that for many people Meta Quest is a better product than Apple Vision Pro.
If you prioritize productivity, Apple Vision Pro has better multitasking features and has more immersive augmented reality.
